| 
        
          
            | 31 | THE MOHAMMEDAN CONTROVERSY |  | 
| 
  have created a great sensation is evident from the discussions which will
  shortly be mentioned. Some of the learned Maulavis of Tonk having seen a copy
  of the Mizân, addressed a note to its author, soliciting a further
  supply of what they term "a wonderful production."1
     | 
  | 
  The Mujtahid (Shiea
  Apologist) of Lucknow, in acknowledging the receipt of Pfander's four books,
  confesses
     | 
  | 
  
       that the style of these delightful treatises differs so completely from
      that hitherto adopted by Christian writers, that he strongly suspected
      some accomplished Persian of having, from worldly motives, assisted in
      their composition, for no such charms or merit had heretofore appeared in
      any writing of the Padres. | 
  | 
  And his sense of their merit was proved by the threat of a refutation. The
  surmise of the celebrated critic is sufficiently amusing; in correcting,
  indeed, and polishing the style of his books, Pfander did avail himself of the
  services of a converted Mussulman, who, born an Armenian, was, when a boy,
  carried off by robbers, and, having been sold to a Persian nobleman, was by
  him educated as his Munshi. Pfander had to tutor both himself and this
  assistant in the language; and the marked superiority in the style of the Tarîq,
  his latest composition, shows what rapid progress he was attaining in the
  beauties of the Persian language. The fourth work referred to above by the
  Apologist of Lucknow, is "The Tree of Life," a small but useful
  Urdoo tract containing a copious selection from Scripture, illustrative of the
  Divine perfections and the Christian code of morals. Pfander has also composed
  a short treatise in English, on the "Nature of Mohammedanism," which
  is recommended to the perusal of all who are interested in the controversy.
     | 
  | 
  It is difficult to say how the Mîzân was regarded in Persia. Its
  distribution, in which great caution was required, was commenced just as the
  Mission was called away; but there is reason to suppose that, notwithstanding
  the bigotry of the Persians, it was liked and perused by them with interest.
  When on his way to India, Pfander fell in, with two respectable Persians, who
  made inquiries about the book and its author, and stated that the
     | 
| 
 |